Bomb Canada?

My husband showed me a post last week that said the US Ambassador to Canada had stated that if Canada wasn’t going to treat the US any better then they might as well bomb our parliament buildings. I was incensed, and ready to retaliate with a hateful post of my own…except…

I decided to fact check.

As much as Pete Hoekstra has made it apparent he does not favour Canada, this report was a joke – put out by our satirical press, The Beaverton.

Apparently Times Magazine did not think to do the same.

Unknown's avatar

Posted by

Permission to write, paint, and imagine are the gifts I gave myself when chronic illness hit - a fair exchange: being for doing. Relevance is an attitude. Humour essential.

8 thoughts on “Bomb Canada?

  1. This is a perfect example of how quickly satire can be mistaken for fact, especially when it aligns with pre-existing frustrations or anxieties about a public figure.

    It’s concerning that Time Magazine apparently missed the satire, highlighting a significant breakdown in editorial fact-checking, even among major publications. It underscores the responsibility every news consumer now holds to question sources, regardless of how “incensing” the headline may be.

    Your impulse to fact-check before retaliating is a valuable lesson for online engagement. The line between genuine political rhetoric and political parody is often dangerously thin in the modern media landscape.

    How do we encourage more critical assessment of sources, particularly when headlines are designed to trigger an emotional, rather than rational, response?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. glad it was a joke (a bad joke) and it disgusts me that these formerly reputable sources are now doing this – they also started a rumor that some politicians were getting divorced and just lame stuff was being spread – sad!

    Like

Leave a reply to sgeoil Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.